[RFC PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: add dt binding support for pinmux mappings

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:21:05AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote:
> Here what I wonder is that do we need to allow the platform to use a func-name
> property in their pinmux func node or pinmux group node to specify the name.

I do not see the necessity.

> If it is allowed, then it could be flexible for soc to define their names.
> If not there may be limitations on their node names since we can only get it from
> the node name.

To me, the node name is perfectly fine to be used for that purpose.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn