Device tree bindings for linux ramoops use
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sat Jan 7 09:09:08 EST 2012
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:39:50PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering how to best describe the data that ramoops needs in
> the device tree.
>
> The idea is really about describing a memory area that is (likely to
> be) nonvolatile across reboots. Said area is not to be included in the
> regular memory map of the system (i.e. not covered by /memory).
>
> I have a few options on where to do it. It's not really a hardware
> device per se, so it's a gray area for the device tree alltogether.
>
> How about something like?
>
> compatible = "linux,ramoops"
> linux,ramoops-start = <start address of preserved ram>
> linux,ramoops-size = ...
I'm not a fan of using separate start & size properties. I'd rather
see a 'reg' type property like "linux,ramoops-mem = <start size>;",
but doing it in separate properties does may early boot code easier to
write. I assume that is why the initrd start and size values are
passed separately.
I can probably be convinced either way though.
g.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list