[PATCH v3 22/25] irq_domain/x86: Convert x86 (embedded) to use common irq_domain
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
bigeasy at linutronix.de
Fri Feb 24 08:22:15 EST 2012
On 02/23/2012 08:56 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Grant Likely<grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>> <bigeasy at linutronix.de> wrote:
>>> * Grant Likely | 2012-01-30 12:58:42 [-0700]:
>>>
>>>> Ugh. This isn't easy. The legacy mapping really needs all the
>>>
>>> Feel free to merge this patch. I don't have the time to look at this now
>>> so I take a look at the ioapic later.
>>
>> There's no rush here. I can leave it as-is with IRQ_DOMAIN turned off
>> for x86 for now.
>
> Turns out I have to enable IRQ_DOMAIN for x86 because the TI TWL4030
> driver needs it. I do need to apply this patch. Until something
> better can be implemented, can I change ioapic_add_ofnode() so that it
> allocates all irq_descs immediately. It's not ideal, but every other
> approach I've looked at results in nasty hacks.
>
> Looking at the ioapic code, it appears to handle preallocated
> irq_descs gracefully.
Please merge your initial patch as-it.
> Does adding this loop help (apologies if it is whitespace damaged, I
> cut&paste it):
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> index 3ae2ced..89c1310 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ const struct irq_domain_ops ioapic_irq_domain_ops = {
> static void __init ioapic_add_ofnode(struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct resource r;
> - int i, ret;
> + int i, j, ret;
>
> ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0,&r);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -361,6 +361,14 @@ static void __init ioapic_add_ofnode(struct
> device_node *np)
>
> gsi_cfg = mp_ioapic_gsi_routing(i);
>
> + /*
> + * Preallocate irq_descs so that the legacy mapping
> + * works, but don't set them up.
> + * io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once() will finish the set up.
> + */
> + for (j = 0; j< 32; j++)
It is not 32. If I remember correctly the first ioapic had 24 pins so
did the second. This is ioapic specifc.
>
> g.
Sebastian
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list