[PATCH v2] irq_domain/microblaze: Convert microblaze to use irq_domains

[Grant Likely]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> 
> Move get_irq to asm/irq.h from hardirq.h.
> 
> Grant: Why does your patch setup NR_IRQS to 64? It seems to me
> pretty big value because intc support up to 32 interrupts.
> The main problem was with get_irq function because there must
> check status of IVR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring at calxeda.com>
> Cc: John Williams <john.williams at petalogix.com>
> Cc: John Linn <john.linn at xilinx.com>
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
> index 3f613df..ace700a 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -31,14 +31,13 @@ void __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	trace_hardirqs_off();
>  
>  	irq_enter();
> -	irq = get_irq(regs);
> +	irq = get_irq();
>  next_irq:
>  	BUG_ON(!irq);
> -	/* Substract 1 because of get_irq */
> -	generic_handle_irq(irq + IRQ_OFFSET - NO_IRQ_OFFSET);
> +	generic_handle_irq(irq);
>  
> -	irq = get_irq(regs);
> -	if (irq) {
> +	irq = get_irq();
> +	if (irq != -1U) {

irq should never be -1 now with my current tree.  I've just pushed it out,
can you take a look and try it with the original "if (!irq)" test?

g.