[PATCH 0/2] usb: exynos: Fix compatible strings used for device

Doug Anderson dianders at chromium.org
Sat Dec 22 04:39:20 EST 2012


On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Vivek Gautam
<gautamvivek1987 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Grant Likely
>> <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:22:26 +0530, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek at samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> Using chip specific compatible string as it should be.
>>>> So fixing this for ehci-s5p, ohci-exynos and dwc3-exynos
>>>> which till now used a generic 'exynos' in their compatible strings.
>>>>
>>>> This goes as per the discussion happened in the thread for
>>>> [PATCH v2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling dwc3-exynos driver
>>>> available at:
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg74145.html
>>>>
>>>> Vivek Gautam (2):
>>>>   usb: ehci-s5p/ohci-exynos: Fix compatible strings for the device
>>>>   usb: dwc3-exynos: Fix compatible strings for the device
>>>
>>> for both patches:
>>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
>>>
>
> Any more thought about this patch-set?
> Or does this change seems fine?

These two changes look good to me.  For both of them:

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list