[PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support

[Viresh Kumar]

Sorry for replying late, was too busy with other work yesterday.

On 11 December 2012 03:38, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> I'm deeply sorry for the very late complaint on this, but I only now

Better late than never :)

> noticed this patch as I was seeing build breakage in linux-next
> because of it.

Oops!! Here is a fix for that

Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
Date:   Wed Dec 12 08:28:07 2012 +0530

    ARM: SPEAr1310: Fix CF DMA data

    We need to pass string with device-channel name to dma controller
instead of dma
    controller specific dma struct. Fix CF dma data.

    Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-spear13xx/spear1310.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear13xx/spear1310.c
b/arch/arm/mach-spear13xx/spear1310.c
index f65ad5b..54f0e2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear13xx/spear1310.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear13xx/spear1310.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 static struct arasan_cf_pdata cf_pdata = {
        .cf_if_clk = CF_IF_CLK_166M,
        .quirk = CF_BROKEN_UDMA,
-       .dma_priv = &cf_dma_priv,
+       .dma_priv = "cf",
 };

> Viresh, there are multiple problems with your approach unfortunately:
>
> * It does not follow the binding from
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt

When i patched it, this patch wasn't there in linux-next/master.
Probably was getting reviewed somewhere :)

> * It requires slave drivers to know that they are using the dw_dmac
>   driver and pass a pointer to dw_generic_filter, which is not
>   generic at all
>
> * It requires the dmac node to have information about all slaves
>
> There are also some minor issues, such as the naming of DT
> properties, but the above need to be resolved first.

I saw the binding document and it looks it can be applied to dw_dmac
too, as there is nothing special for it.

The question is how? We are already late for merge window and this
one is queued. Supplying a new patch, getting it reviewed/tested and
being pulled by Linus is not so easy :)

Two ways:
- Keep it as is, and i will fix it separately and quickly
- Drop it :(

--
viresh