[PATCH RFC 05/13] of: Add empty for_each_available_child_of_node() macro definition
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Tue Dec 11 19:57:07 EST 2012
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:41:31 +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki at samsung.com> wrote:
> Add this empty macro definition so users can be compiled without
> excluding this macro call with preprocessor directives when CONFIG_OF
> is disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
What non-OF code is calling this function?
g.
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index 2fb0dbe..7df42cc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
> #define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> while (0)
>
> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> + while (0)
> +
> static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
> const struct device_node *node,
> const char *name)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list