[PATCH 2/2] Input: matrix_keymap - wire up device tree support
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Fri Apr 27 01:05:18 EST 2012
On 04/26/2012 02:19 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> When platform keymap is not supplied to matrix_keypad_build_keymap()
> and device tree support is enabled, try locating specified property
> and load keymap from it. If property name is not defined, try using
> "linux,keymap".
>
> Based on earlier patch by Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at st.com>
I think this series looks mostly OK. A few comments below.
We don't actually have the KBC driver hooked up on any boards yet, so I
can't actually test this yet.
How will the linux,fn-keymap handling work? It looks like this code is
allocating a keymap data structure with one additional row to represent
fn-not-pressed vs. fn-pressed. I assume this will work without issue
even though the second half is not filled in. Won't this allow the
linux,keymap property entries to pass validation "if (row >= rows)" for
one more row than it should?
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c
> +static int __devinit tegra_kbd_setup_keymap(struct tegra_kbc *kbc)
> +{
> + const struct tegra_kbc_platform_data *pdata = kbc->pdata;
> + const struct matrix_keymap_data *keymap_data = pdata->keymap_data;
> + unsigned int keymap_rows = KBC_MAX_KEY;
> + int retval;
> +
> + if (pdata->use_fn_map)
> + keymap_rows *= 2;
> +
> + retval = matrix_keypad_build_keymap(keymap_data, NULL,
> + keymap_rows, KBC_MAX_COL,
> + kbc->keycode, kbc->idev);
> + if (retval == -ENOSYS || retval == -ENOENT) {
This is looking for ENOSYS or ENOENT, but ...
> diff --git a/drivers/input/matrix-keymap.c b/drivers/input/matrix-keymap.c
> +static int matrix_keypad_parse_of_keymap(const char *propname,
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
Here and ...
> + prop = of_get_property(np, propname, &proplen);
> + if (!prop) {
> + dev_err(dev, "OF: %s property not defined in %s\n",
> + propname, np->full_name);
> + return -ENODEV;
Here return ENODEV instead.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list