[PATCH v5 04/16] pwm: Add table-based lookup for static mappings

[Shawn Guo]

On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:20:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:30:21PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
> > The "bad"
> > thing is that it'll make the "pwm-names" property mandatory if more than a
> > single PWM is requested.
> > 
> You do not have to make it mandatory, but anyone requesting any pwm
> other than the first on in "pwms" list should fail.
> 
I should have put it this way.  If a client device does not have
"pwm-names" property in its node, it should fail when requesting pwm
with a name.  And if no name is given, the first pwm device in the
"pwms" list could just be returned.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn