Multiple ic2 muxes in a device tree

[Stephen Warren]

James Baldwin wrote at Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:24 PM:
> I have the following i2c topology and specify the devices as follows:
> i2c at 3100 {
>         #address-cells = <1>;
>         #size-cells = <0>;
>         cell-index = <1>;
>         compatible = "fsl-i2c";
>         reg = <0x3100 0x100>;
>         interrupts = <15 0x8>;
>         interrupt-parent = <&ipic>;
>         dfsrr;
> 
>         temp-sensor at 49 {
>                 compatible = "national,lm73";
>                 reg = <0x49>;
>         };
> 
>         eeprom at 54 {
>                 compatible = "at24,24c02";
>                 reg = <0x54>;
>                 pagesize = <4>;
>         };
> 
>         mux at 77 {

Bear in mind I'm very new to devicetree, but in:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org/msg03910.html
it was suggested to name this node "i2cmux" not "mux".

>                 #address-cells = <2>;
>                 #size-cells = <0>;
>                 compatible = "philips,pca9547";
>                 reg = <0x77>;
> 
>                 mux at 0,70 {

... and this node "i2c" not "mux".

The implication was the the node names actually have an effect on the
parsing, and need to match the type of object represented. Does renaming
them following those conventions help?

>                         #address-cells = <2>;
>                         #size-cells = <0>;
>                         compatible = "philips,pca9547";
>                         reg = <0 0x70>;
>                 };
>...

-- 
nvpublic