[RFC v2] OLPC: add missing elements to device tree
Andres Salomon
dilinger at queued.net
Wed Mar 16 09:27:26 EST 2011
Looks good to me as well.
Acked-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger at queued.net>
This should probably be forwarded to the x86 folks.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011
21:33:35 -0600 Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 06:04:48PM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > In response to new device tree code in the kernel, OLPC will start
> > using it for probing of certain devices. However, some firmware
> > fixes are needed to put the devicetree into a usable state.
> >
> > Retain compatibility with old firmware by fixing up the device tree
> > at boot-time if it does not contain the new nodes/properties that
> > we need for probing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org>
>
> Looks okay to me.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
>
> g.
>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c | 104
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 104
> > insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > v2: ask OpenFirmware to adjust the tree instead of manipulating the
> > tree on the linux level.
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
> > b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c index 24f2598..d6ee929 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > #include <linux/of_pdt.h>
> > +#include <asm/olpc.h>
> > #include <asm/olpc_ofw.h>
> >
> > static phandle __init olpc_dt_getsibling(phandle node)
> > @@ -164,6 +165,107 @@ static struct of_pdt_ops prom_olpc_ops
> > __initdata = { .pkg2path = olpc_dt_pkg2path,
> > };
> >
> > +static phandle __init olpc_dt_finddevice(const char *path)
> > +{
> > + phandle node;
> > + const void *args[] = { path };
> > + void *res[] = { &node };
> > +
> > + if (olpc_ofw("finddevice", args, res)) {
> > + pr_err("olpc_dt: finddevice failed!\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if ((s32) node == -1)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return node;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init olpc_dt_interpret(const char *words)
> > +{
> > + int result;
> > + const void *args[] = { words };
> > + void *res[] = { &result };
> > +
> > + if (olpc_ofw("interpret", args, res)) {
> > + pr_err("olpc_dt: interpret failed!\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return result;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Extract board revision directly from OFW device tree.
> > + * We can't use olpc_platform_info because that hasn't been set up
> > yet.
> > + */
> > +static u32 __init olpc_dt_get_board_revision(void)
> > +{
> > + phandle node;
> > + __be32 rev;
> > + int r;
> > +
> > + node = olpc_dt_finddevice("/");
> > + if (!node)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + r = olpc_dt_getproperty(node, "board-revision-int",
> > + (char *) &rev, sizeof(rev));
> > + if (r < 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return be32_to_cpu(rev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void)
> > +{
> > + int r;
> > + char buf[64];
> > + phandle node;
> > + u32 board_rev;
> > +
> > + node = olpc_dt_finddevice("/battery at 0");
> > + if (!node)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the battery node has a compatible property, we are
> > running a new
> > + * enough firmware and don't have fixups to make.
> > + */
> > + r = olpc_dt_getproperty(node, "compatible", buf,
> > sizeof(buf));
> > + if (r > 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + pr_info("PROM DT: Old firmware detected, applying
> > fixes\n"); +
> > + /* Add olpc,xo1-battery compatible marker to battery node
> > */
> > + olpc_dt_interpret("\" /battery at 0\" find-device"
> > + " \" olpc,xo1-battery\" +compatible"
> > + " device-end");
> > +
> > + board_rev = olpc_dt_get_board_revision();
> > + if (!board_rev)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (board_rev >= olpc_board_pre(0xd0)) {
> > + /* XO-1.5: add dcon device */
> > + olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display at 1\" find-device"
> > + " new-device"
> > + " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\"
> > +compatible"
> > + " finish-device device-end");
> > + } else {
> > + /* XO-1: add dcon device, mark RTC as olpc,xo1-rtc
> > */
> > + olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display at 1,1\"
> > find-device"
> > + " new-device"
> > + " \" dcon\" device-name \" olpc,xo1-dcon\"
> > +compatible"
> > + " finish-device device-end"
> > + " \" /rtc\" find-device"
> > + " \" olpc,xo1-rtc\" +compatible"
> > + " device-end");
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > void __init olpc_dt_build_devicetree(void)
> > {
> > phandle root;
> > @@ -171,6 +273,8 @@ void __init olpc_dt_build_devicetree(void)
> > if (!olpc_ofw_is_installed())
> > return;
> >
> > + olpc_dt_fixup();
> > +
> > root = olpc_dt_getsibling(0);
> > if (!root) {
> > pr_err("PROM: unable to get root node from
> > OFW!\n"); --
> > 1.7.4
> >
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list