[PATCH 5/5] of/clock: eliminate function __of_clk_get_from_provider
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Tue Mar 15 19:04:27 EST 2011
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:59:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:54:05AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:18:42PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > With the platform clock support, the 'struct clk' should have been
> > > associated with device_node->data. So the use of function
> > > __of_clk_get_from_provider can be eliminated.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/of/clock.c | 23 ++---------------------
> > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/clock.c b/drivers/of/clock.c
> > > index 7b5ea67..f124d0a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/of/clock.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/of/clock.c
> > > @@ -71,24 +71,6 @@ void of_clk_del_provider(struct device_node *np,
> > > mutex_unlock(&of_clk_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static struct clk *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct device_node *np, const char *clk_output)
> > > -{
> > > - struct of_clk_provider *provider;
> > > - struct clk *clk = NULL;
> > > -
> > > - /* Check if we have such a provider in our array */
> > > - mutex_lock(&of_clk_lock);
> > > - list_for_each_entry(provider, &of_clk_providers, link) {
> > > - if (provider->node == np)
> > > - clk = provider->get(np, clk_output, provider->data);
> > > - if (clk)
> > > - break;
> > > - }
> > > - mutex_unlock(&of_clk_lock);
> > > -
> > > - return clk;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > struct clk *of_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> > > {
> > > struct device_node *provnode;
> > > @@ -123,9 +105,8 @@ struct clk *of_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
> > > __func__, prop_name, dev->of_node->full_name);
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > > - clk = __of_clk_get_from_provider(provnode, prop);
> > > - if (clk)
> > > - dev_dbg(dev, "Using clock from %s\n", provnode->full_name);
> > > +
> > > + clk = provnode->data;
> >
> > Where is the device_node->data pointer getting set?
> >
> +#define ADD_CLK_LOOKUP() \
> + do { \
> + node->data = clk; \
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> + \
> + cl->dev_id = dev_id; \
> + cl->clk = clk; \
> + clkdev_add(cl); \
> + \
> + return 0; \
> + \
> + out_kfree: \
> + kfree(cl); \
> + return ret; \
> + } while (0)
Yeah... don't do that! :-)
g.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list