[PATCH V2 1/3] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 11 March 2011, Jason Hui wrote:
> >> Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers
> >> in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain
> >> any mx51 specific settings but always refer to properties in the
> >> device tree for the differences.
> >
> > I saw that your V4 still implements neither Shawn's suggestion nor mine.
> 
> As you said, I don't want to make thing complex too. I don't want to
> have mx51_dt or
> mx53_dt as Shawn Suggests and I still don't want to make it change to
> mx5 now as you suggest
> Since this patch only support mx51 currently. I think it's easy to
> make change later once mx53 in-deed
> added in DT support, what do you think?

It would also be easy to rename the file from mx51_dt to board_dt
when it becomes more generic. I don't consider it a show-stopper
though and am comfortable with leaving it to your own judgement.

Generally speaking, you don't have to do everything that reviewers
suggest, but please reply to explain your reasons if you disagree.

	Arnd