[PATCH V2 1/3] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support

[Grant Likely]

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> > Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers
>> > in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain
>> > any mx51 specific settings but always refer to properties in the
>> > device tree for the differences.
>> >
>> So our ultimate goal is to have only one board-dt.c in one mach-xxx?
>
> I wouldn't make that a strict rule, but I'd say that one goal should be
> to have as few board-dt files as possible without adding complexity.
>
> As a start, we can say we want one file for per set of machines that
> can run a common binary kernel, but there may be good reasons for
> deviating from that rule on both sides.

+1, I completely agree.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.