[PATCHv2] mtd: gpio-nand: add device tree bindings

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sun Jul 31 13:19:31 EST 2011


On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:46:31AM +0100, Jamie Iles wrote:
> Add device tree bindings so that the gpio-nand driver may be
> instantiated from the device tree.  This also allows the partitions
> to be specified in the device tree.
> 
> v2:
> 	- add CONFIG_OF guards for non-dt platforms
> 	- compatible becomes gpio-control-nand
> 	- clarify some binding details
> 
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1 at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie at jamieiles.com>

Hey Jamie,

Mostly looks good.  Comments below.  You can add my acked-by when you
address them.

[...]
> +static int gpio_nand_of_get_config(struct device *dev,
> +				   struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)
> +{
> +	int ret = gpio_nand_of_get_options(dev, plat);
> +
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	gpio_nand_of_get_gpio(dev, plat);
> +	gpio_nand_of_get_chip_delay(dev, plat);

Personally, I would just open code it and not bother with the extra
functions, but whatever you prefer.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_OF */
> +#define gpio_nand_id_table NULL
> +static inline int gpio_nand_of_get_config(struct device *dev,
> +					  struct gpio_nand_platdata *plat)
> +{
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> +
>  static int __devinit gpio_nand_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct gpiomtd *gpiomtd;
>  	struct nand_chip *this;
>  	struct resource *res0, *res1;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (!dev->dev.platform_data)
> +	if (!dev->dev.of_node && !dev->dev.platform_data)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	res0 = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -257,11 +325,17 @@ static int __devinit gpio_nand_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	memcpy(&gpiomtd->plat, dev->dev.platform_data, sizeof(gpiomtd->plat));
> +	if (dev->dev.platform_data)
> +		memcpy(&gpiomtd->plat, dev->dev.platform_data,
> +		       sizeof(gpiomtd->plat));
> +	else
> +		ret = gpio_nand_of_get_config(&dev->dev, &gpiomtd->plat);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_config;
>  
>  	ret = gpio_request(gpiomtd->plat.gpio_nce, "NAND NCE");
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err_nce;
> +		goto err_config;

Nit: There's not much purpose it changing the label.

>  	gpio_direction_output(gpiomtd->plat.gpio_nce, 1);
>  	if (gpio_is_valid(gpiomtd->plat.gpio_nwp)) {
>  		ret = gpio_request(gpiomtd->plat.gpio_nwp, "NAND NWP");
> @@ -312,12 +386,21 @@ static int __devinit gpio_nand_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>  		goto err_wp;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (gpiomtd->plat.adjust_parts)
> -		gpiomtd->plat.adjust_parts(&gpiomtd->plat,
> -					   gpiomtd->mtd_info.size);
> +	if (dev->dev.platform_data) {
> +		if (gpiomtd->plat.adjust_parts)
> +			gpiomtd->plat.adjust_parts(&gpiomtd->plat,
> +						   gpiomtd->mtd_info.size);
> +	} else {
> +		ret = of_mtd_parse_partitions(&dev->dev, dev->dev.of_node,
> +					      &gpiomtd->plat.parts);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto err_wp;
>  
> +		gpiomtd->plat.num_parts = (unsigned int)ret;

Is the casting necessary?  I don't think it is.

> +	}
>  	mtd_device_register(&gpiomtd->mtd_info, gpiomtd->plat.parts,
>  			    gpiomtd->plat.num_parts);
> +

Nit: Unrelated whitespace change.

>  	platform_set_drvdata(dev, gpiomtd);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -335,7 +418,7 @@ err_ale:
>  		gpio_free(gpiomtd->plat.gpio_nwp);
>  err_nwp:
>  	gpio_free(gpiomtd->plat.gpio_nce);
> -err_nce:
> +err_config:
>  	iounmap(gpiomtd->io_sync);
>  	if (res1)
>  		release_mem_region(res1->start, resource_size(res1));
> @@ -352,6 +435,7 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_nand_driver = {
>  	.remove		= gpio_nand_remove,
>  	.driver		= {
>  		.name	= "gpio-nand",
> +		.of_match_table = gpio_nand_id_table,
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.4.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list