[RFC/PATCH 0/7] decouple platform_device from omap_device

Hilman, Kevin khilman at ti.com
Thu Jul 28 07:45:33 EST 2011


Hi Manjunath,

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:04 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk at ti.com> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:52:10PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Here's a first whack, proof-of-concept on how we could start to
>> decouple the platform_device from an omap_device.
>>
>> The main RFC is in the last patch, and everything leading up to it are
>> misc. omap_device cleanups that make the last patch cleaner and
>> clearer.  It's really the last patch that does the decoupling.
>>
>> This will be necessary if we're going to decouple the platform_device
>> creation from the omap_device/omap_hwmod creation etc.  This patch
>> leaves them both done in omap_device_build(), but shows that they can
>> be decoupled.
> Can you pls mention baseline used for these patches? I tried applying on
> latest mainline, v3.0 and  git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 prcm-devel-3.1

Oops, sorry.  I forgot to mention it.

Due to some misc. dependencies (mainly on Beagle board file), I've
temporarily based it on the for-next branch of the arm-soc tree[1]
since that has everything already queued for the next merge window. I
also based it on the omap_device patch I posted which changes the pr_*
prints to dev_*.

For convenience, I've pushed this series to the 'wip/od-devres' branch
of my tree[2].

Sorry for the confusion,

Kevin

[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/linux-arm-soc.git

[2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list