Is there a binding for IORESOURCE_DMA population?
Tabi Timur-B04825
B04825 at freescale.com
Sun Jul 17 06:54:21 EST 2011
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> But that would mean that the code interpreting that property has to
> know about the specific dmaengine implementation, and needs to be
> changed every time we add a new one.
And like I said, the SSI driver will already need to know the specifics of
the DMA controller. The PowerPC device tree node for the SSI already
works this way:
ssi at 15000 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc8610-ssi";
cell-index = <0>;
reg = <0x15000 0x100>;
interrupts = <75 2 0 0>;
fsl,mode = "i2s-slave";
codec-handle = <&wm8776>;
fsl,playback-dma = <&dma00>;
fsl,capture-dma = <&dma01>;
fsl,fifo-depth = <15>;
fsl,ssi-asynchronous;
};
On PowerPC, the SSI driver knows that "fsl,playback-dma" points to a
Freescale e500 DMA controller channel node. The driver currently does not
work with any other DMA controller. This is what needs to be fixed.
> Alternatively, you'd end up with the device drivers having to
> read the properties themselves to get to the number and pass
> that to the common dmaengine code.
The SSI won't be able to use any common DMA engine code, because DMA needs
to be set up in a very specific way for audio.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list