[Power.org:parch] ePAPR 1.1 to do list
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Wed Jan 12 09:26:15 EST 2011
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:14:53 -0600
Yoder Stuart-B08248 <B08248 at freescale.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:18 PM
> > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> > Cc: parch at power.org; devicetree-discuss
> > Subject: Re: [Power.org:parch] ePAPR 1.1 to do list
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:34:44 -0700
> > Yoder Stuart-B08248 <B08248 at freescale.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I've consolidated what I am aware of with respect to errors found in
> > > 1.0, clarifications needed, and new mechanisms to go into ePAPR 1.1
> > > into a single list.
> > >
> > > Let me know if you are aware of anything else.
> > >
> > > ePAPR 1.1 To Do
> > > ---------------
> > >
> > > 1. Fix typos, misc cleanup
> > >
> > > -device_type="simple-bus" in 8572 soc node example (p.96)
> > > -p.51, line 27-- ET_EXEC is 0x2 not 0x1
> > > -p.41, broken cross reference
> > > -missing period on virtual reg on ns16550
> >
> > 2.3.11 says device_type should only be present for cpu and memory nodes,
> > but the example trees in the appendices contain device_type = "serial",
> > "network", "pci", and "open-pic" (as well as the simple-bus error mentioned
> > above).
>
> Note-- the upstream device tree still has those device_type properties.
> Should we still remove them from the example?
How about we remove them from upstream, and fix any code that relies on
it?
-Scott
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list