[PATCH 1/3] picoxcell: support for Picochip picoxcell devices
Jamie Iles
jamie at jamieiles.com
Sat Aug 20 16:52:51 EST 2011
Hi Grant,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:31:40PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 11-08-09 03:10 AM, Jamie Iles wrote:
[...]
> >+VIC required properties:
> >+ - compatible = "arm,pl192-vic-pair".
> >+ - interrupt-controller.
> >+ - reg : The register bank for the devices. Picoxcell has two VIC's and the
> >+ IRQ outputs are wire-OR'd together so we effectively have a combined
> >+ controller that handles 64 IRQ's. The first reg tuple is the register
> >+ bank of the VIC that generates IRQ's 0->31 and the second tuple handles
> >+ IRQ's 32->63.
>
> If they are two separate devices, then it probably should still be
> represented as two separate device tree nodes. Linux can take care
> of assigning a range of linux irq numbers to each VIC.
The reason I did this is because of the entry macro get_irqnr_and_base
macro decoding. If I used irq_domain_generate_simple() rather than
irq_domain_add_simple() then I guess the ordering of the VIC's in the DT
wont matter. I'll give this a test when I have access to hardware again
and respin.
Many thanks for the review!
Jamie
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list