[PATCH 4/5] mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at freescale.com
Fri Apr 1 17:18:36 EST 2011
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:53:12AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:50PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
> > controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms. It turns
> > sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc-imx.c into one sdhci-esdhc.c,
> > which gets the same pair of .probe and .remove serving two cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 38 ++--
> > drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 3 +-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 210 ------------------
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc.c | 413 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 162 --------------
>
> This patch would be easier to review if it was split into two patches;
> first rename sdhci-esdhc-imx.c to sdhci-esdhc.c without any changes to
> the .c code, and then a second patch to merge the ppc bits into the
> imx version.
>
OK.
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +static const struct of_device_id sdhci_esdhc_dt_ids[] = {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx-esdhc", .data = &sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata },
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_MPC
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8379-esdhc", .data = &sdhci_esdhc_mpc_pdata },
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-esdhc", .data = &sdhci_esdhc_mpc_pdata },
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,esdhc", .data = &sdhci_esdhc_mpc_pdata },
> > +#endif
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, sdhci_esdhc_dt_ids);
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id *
> > +sdhci_esdhc_get_of_device_id(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + return of_match_device(sdhci_esdhc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
>
> You can add an empty implementation of of_match_device() to
> linux/of_device.h. That would eliminate the need for this function.
>
Will follow what you suggested later to use .of_match pointer newly
added into struct device.
--
Regards,
Shawn
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list