[PATCH v6 0/8] ptp: IEEE 1588 hardware clock support
Alan Cox
alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Fri Sep 24 07:34:17 EST 2010
> There is no other scalable time source available for fast timer access
> than the time stamp counter in the cpu. Other time source require
> memory accesses which is inherently slower.
On what hardware ?
> An accurate other time source is used to adjust this clock. NTP does that
> via the clock interfaces from user space which has its problems with
> accuracy. PTP can provide the network synced time access
> that would a more accurate calibration of the time.
Accuracy does not require speed of access. Accuracy requires predictible
latency of access.
> Userland code would introduce latencies that would make sub microsecond
> time sync very difficult.
You can take a multiple micro-second I/O stall or SMI trap on a PC so you
already lost the battle on the platform you seem to be discussing.
> You dont need the user APIs if you directly use the PTP time source to
> steer the system clock. In fact I think you have to do it in kernel space
> since user space latencies will degrade accuracy otherwise.
PTP is not a 'time source' it is one or more source of time. The
distinction is rather important.
> It implies clock tuning in userspace for a potential sub microsecond
> accurate clock. The clock accuracy will be limited by user space
> latencies and noise. You wont be able to discipline the system clock
> accurately.
Noise matters, latency doesn't. And the kernel is getting more and more
real time support all the time.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list