[PATCH] sparc: stop exporting openprom.h header

Andres Salomon dilinger at queued.net
Sat Oct 9 08:34:50 EST 2010


On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:00:25 -0600
Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:52 PM, David Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
> wrote:
> > From: Andres Salomon <dilinger at queued.net>
> > Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:34:24 -0700
> >
> >>
> >> It's unknown why openprom.h was being exported; there doesn't seem
> >> to be any reason for it currently, and it creates headaches with
> >> userspace being able to potentially use the structures in there.
> >>  So, don't export it anymore.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger at queued.net>
> >
> > Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
> 
> I suppose it makes sense for me to pick this one up into my tree so it
> is grouped with the rest of the pdt patches.  I'll pick it up once
> Andres reposts the series.
> 
> g.

Ok, I sent a new version of the phandle stuff (which was easier than
expected, and doesn't affect any other patches).

So to summarize, what's pending is:

1- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/242041/ (sparc: stop exporting
   openprom.h header)
   Acked by Dave

2- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/242601/ ([v3] sparc: convert
   various prom_* functions to use phandle)
   Acked by Dave

3- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141011/ (sparc: break out some
   PROM device-tree building code out into drivers/of)
   Acked by Dave

4- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141021/ (sparc: make
   drivers/of/pdt.c no longer sparc-only)
   Acked by Dave

5- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141031/ (of: no longer call prom_
   functions directly; use an ops structure)
   Acked by Dave

6- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141041/ (of: add
   of_pdt namespace to pdt code)
   Acked by Dave

7- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141051/ (of: add package-to-path
   support to pdt)

8- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/141071/ (x86: OLPC: add OLPC
   device-tree support)

The make-of-build-on-x86 stuff is already in your tree.


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list