[PATCH] powerpc: make the padding for the device tree a configurable option

Benjamin Herrenschmidt benh at kernel.crashing.org
Thu May 20 10:23:53 EST 2010


On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 19:03 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> The problem is that the code which allocates a block for the fdt is
> completely distinct from the code that manipulates the fdt.  We'd need
> to put in either some kind of funky callback mechanism, or insist that
> every fdt exist in a block of memory allocated by some specific method
> (e.g. lmb).
> 
> I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place, it seems.  No one is
> willing to compromise on any of my ideas.  It's hard to convince our
> BSP developers that they should be pushing more code upstream when I
> get so much resistance for a such a mundane change. 

I don't see why we couldn't add a callback to libfdt for allocation /
reallocation.

Cheers,
Ben.




More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list