[v2 PATCH] of/flattree: Fix unhandled OF_DT_NOP tag when unflattening the device tree
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sat Mar 20 07:01:49 EST 2010
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com>
NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
entire nodes depending on various environment parameters.
of_scan_flat_dt already handles NOP more generally.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
---
v2 - adapted to new location of unflatten_dt_node().
Jason, please test against 2.6.34-rc1
drivers/of/fdt.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index 406757a..dee4fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -376,8 +376,11 @@ unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(unsigned long mem,
if (!np->type)
np->type = "<NULL>";
}
- while (tag == OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE) {
- mem = unflatten_dt_node(mem, p, np, allnextpp, fpsize);
+ while (tag == OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE || tag == OF_DT_NOP) {
+ if (tag == OF_DT_NOP)
+ *p += 4;
+ else
+ mem = unflatten_dt_node(mem, p, np, allnextpp, fpsize);
tag = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)(*p));
}
if (tag != OF_DT_END_NODE) {
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list