Using devices trees on X86

[Grant Likely]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:57:33 -0700 Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>
>> 2) config OF is currently implemented in the architecture code.  This
>> should be non-architecture dependent and selected by the arches that
>> need it.
>>
>> Comments greatly appreciated, in particular if you have
>> likely-to-be-easy-to-get-accepted suggestions for 3), or feel like
>> carefully solving 2) in
>> a way which doesn't bork the existing of-based arches.
>
> See the following patch set.  Parts 1, 2 and 3 could be applied to the
> respective architecture trees as well as Grant's tree to aleviate some
> conflict problems.  Part 5 could wait until a later time if necessary.
> However, this is relatively trivial, so we could just collect ACKs and
> put it all in Grant's tree and live with any minor pain.
>
> Having OF in more than one Kconfig file should not cause any problems as
> long as they are all the same.

I've got an Ack from David now.  I'll wait for more acks, and then
pull the whole series of 5 into my devicetree-next branch.  It's
certainly less invasive that some of the other changes arch changes
I've taken through my tree.

g.