Request review of device tree documentation
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Tue Jun 15 03:26:13 EST 2010
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> First, the primary use case for "keeping OFW alive" is for debugging purposes.
> OFW remains resident in memory so that, if the OS is set to allow it (not the
> default), a hot-key freezes the OS and enters OFW, where a human can inspect
> the state of devices and OS data structures. A high skill level is required,
> so it's okay if some fiddling is necessary to find or establish virtual
> addresses or do similar magic .
Why would you impose such pain on yourself in order to try to make OFW a
viable debugging tool on ARM for live kernels, while you can achieve the
same and more much less intrusively and so much more safely with a JTAG
based debugger?
If the cost of a JTAG solution is a concern, you can order USB based
JTAG dongles on the net for less than $30 and use them with OpenOCD[1].
Otherwise, what's wrong with already supported kgdb, or even kdb?
[1] http://openocd.berlios.de/web/
Nicolas
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list