[PATCH 2/8] drivers/of: Make device tree code work on any arch.

Stephen Neuendorffer stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com
Sat Jul 17 04:34:50 EST 2010



> -----Original Message-----
> From: glikely at secretlab.ca [mailto:glikely at secretlab.ca] On Behalf Of Grant Likely
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:32 AM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] drivers/of: Make device tree code work on any arch.
> 
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
> <stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > I'm not sure what the right way to abstract these functions is.
> > of_node_to_nid seems specific to those platforms which have a root
> > device tree.  pci_address_to_pio seems to probably have a useful
> > implementation, but I'm not sure what it's trying to do.  Perhaps
> > someone can shed some light?
> 
> Right now I'm making each arch implement the pci_address_to_pio() and
> of_node_to_nid() hooks.  Not sure if I'll retain that in the long
> term.  pci_address_to_pio() will probably become common code
> eventually.

One thought that I had was to factor those archs/platforms that have a root device tree
(and probably have a useful of_node_to_nid), from those that don't.  This would also simplify
some of the #ifdefs in drivers/of/fdt.c which pick out MICROBLAZE, POWERPC and SPARC for
the early_device_tree stuff.

Steve


This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.




More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list