RFC: proposal to extend the open-pic interrupt specifier definition
David Gibson
dwg at au1.ibm.com
Thu Jan 7 11:50:36 EST 2010
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:28:12PM -0700, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
> The current open-pic binding defines that interrupt specifiers
> have 2 cells-- an interrupt number and level/sense encoding.
>
> With chips like the P4080 this is no longer sufficient to
> represent the various types of interrupt sources handled by
> the interrupt controller. A linear list of interrupt numbers
> doesn't handle all interrupt types-- there are at least 4 different
> kinds of interrupts on the P4080.
>
> We have a proposal to extend the open-pic binding in
> a backwards compatible way to encode additional information
> in the level/sense field.
>
> The current definition of level/sense is:
> 0 = low to high edge sensitive type enabled
> 1 = active low level sensitive type enabled
> 2 = active high level sensitive type enabled
> 3 = high to low edge sensitive type enabled
>
> Those 2 bits would retain their current meaning, but the
> full encoding would be extended as follows:
>
> bits meaning
> ----------------------------------------------
> 0-7 interrupt sub-type
> 8-15 interrupt type
> 16-23 implementation dependent
> 24-29 reserved
> 30-31 level/sense encoding
Um.. what do "type" and "sub-type" mean in this context?
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list