[PATCH 2/9] proc_devtree: fix THIS_MODULE without module.h
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Sun Feb 14 17:09:54 EST 2010
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 09:02 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr at canonical.com>
>
> Commit e22f628395432b967f2f505858c64450f7835365 introduced a build
> breakage for ARM devtree work: the THIS_MODULE macro was added, but we
> don't have module.h
>
> This change adds the necessary #include to get THIS_MODULE defined.
> While we could just replace it with NULL (PROC_FS is a bool, not a
> tristate), using THIS_MODULE will prevent unexpected breakage if we
> ever do compile this as a module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr at canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> fs/proc/proc_devtree.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> index 0ec4511..f8650dc 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/stat.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> #include <asm/prom.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include "internal.h"
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list