[PATCH 02/11] x86: Add device tree support

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Fri Dec 31 07:58:09 EST 2010


On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>> What is the boot sequence for the embedded x86 platforms?  Is there
>> still a bootloader?
>
> There's no one embedded setup on any platform, but one of the few
> constants of embedded development is trying to eliminate unnecessary
> requirements.
>
> Just on standard-ish PC hardware I've seen people try to stick Linux in the
> BIOS flash (generally not enough room), I've seen people try to stick
> it as the first stage PXE payload, there's the fun and games with
> kexec of emergency kernels for crash dumps...
>
> If the capability to skip an unnecessary bootloader was available, people
> would use it.

Right, but in all of those cases a boot wrapper provides the same
functionality with better flexability, such as being able to provided
the dtb image(s) at install time instead of compile time.

g.


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list