[RFC PATCH 11/14] ARM: PMU: add device tree probing

Grant Likely grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Thu Aug 19 07:36:38 EST 2010


On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com> wrote:
> When OF is enabled, platform drivers are required to define a
> match table in order to allow the kernel to find drivers suitable
> for a given device. The device tree allows to retrieve resources
> from device tree nodes dynamically.
>
> This patch adds device tree support to the ARM PMU driver. This
> includes a match table and code to initialize the driver id from
> the respective device tree node compatible property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h |    6 ++++++
>  arch/arm/kernel/Makefile   |    3 ++-
>  arch/arm/kernel/pmu-of.c   |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c      |   18 ++++++++++++------
>  4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/pmu-of.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> index 8ccea01..d317b64 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ enum arm_pmu_type {
>        ARM_NUM_PMU_DEVICES,
>  };
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_OF
> +static inline int pmu_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) { return -ENODEV; }
> +#else
> +extern int __devinit pmu_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev);
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU
>
>  /**
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> index 0ace897..b7d846f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -48,7 +48,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE)      += xscale-cp0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSC3)         += xscale-cp0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_MOHAWK)       += xscale-cp0.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_IWMMXT)           += iwmmxt.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU)      += pmu.o
> +pmu_of-$(CONFIG_OF)            := pmu-of.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU)      += pmu.o $(pmu_of-y)
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS)   += perf_event.o
>  AFLAGS_iwmmxt.o                        := -Wa,-mcpu=iwmmxt
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/pmu-of.c b/arch/arm/kernel/pmu-of.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5c5ee94
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/pmu-of.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +/*
> + *  linux/arch/arm/kernel/pmu-of.c --  PMU DT probe function
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/pmu.h>
> +
> +int __devinit pmu_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       int ret = -ENODEV;
> +       struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +
> +       if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "arm,arm-pmu")) {
> +               pdev->id = ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU;
> +               ret = 0;
> +       } else {
> +               pr_warning("Probing device not recognized "
> +                               "device %s\n", node->full_name);

Do you really want the warning on an OF-enabled kernel when booting on
an non-OF board?

> +       }
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}

How about:
{
        if (!of_match_node(arm_pmu_matches, node))
                return -ENODEV;

        pdev->id = ARM_PMU_DEVICE_CPU;
        return 0;
}

Clearer and more concise, no?

Also, (as you've brought up before) the pdev->id issue needs to be
solved.  I don't believe it is allowed to change the id field after
the platform_device is registered.  I'd rather see the id dynamically
assigned, which generally works in the OF use-case because
interconnections between devices are described in the tree and
specific ids aren't really needed.  However, it could be that the best
thing to do is retrieve the system-wide unique id from the aliases
node.

... and ditto on my comment that this will be simpler if it lives
directly in pmu.c.  :-)

> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c
> index b8af96e..f070b3d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c
> @@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ static struct platform_device *pmu_devices[ARM_NUM_PMU_DEVICES];
>
>  static int __devinit pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -
> -       if (pdev->id < 0 || pdev->id >= ARM_NUM_PMU_DEVICES) {
> -               pr_warning("received registration request for unknown "
> -                               "device %d\n", pdev->id);
> -               return -EINVAL;
> -       }
> +       if (pmu_probe_dt(pdev) == -ENODEV)
> +               if (pdev->id < 0 || pdev->id >= ARM_NUM_PMU_DEVICES) {
> +                       pr_warning("received registration request for unknown "
> +                                       "device %d\n", pdev->id);
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               }
>
>        if (pmu_devices[pdev->id])
>                pr_warning("registering new PMU device type %d overwrites "
> @@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ static int __devinit pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>        return 0;
>  }
>
> +static struct of_device_id arm_pmu_matches[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "arm,arm-pmu"},
> +       {},
> +};
> +
>  static struct platform_driver pmu_driver = {
>        .driver         = {
>                .name   = "arm-pmu",
> @@ -54,6 +59,7 @@ static struct platform_driver pmu_driver = {
>
>  static int __init register_pmu_driver(void)
>  {
> +       platform_init_match(&pmu_driver, arm_pmu_matches);
>        return platform_driver_register(&pmu_driver);
>  }
>  device_initcall(register_pmu_driver);
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.


More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list