olpc ofw question

[Segher Boessenkool]

> I've run a comparison between OLPC's old OFW code (which mounts the
> device-tree at /ofw, and makes use of the sparc code) versus the code
> which I'm planning to send upstream (which mounts the device-tree
> at /proc/device-tree, and makes use of PROC_DEVTREE).  The results are
> here:

[unit addresses are missing]

> Any insight into the reasoning for this mangling?

It sounds to me like you're not putting the (textual representation
of the) unit address in the device_node->full_name field.  How do
you fill that field?


Segher