[PATCH v2 4/9] drivers/of: Allow IRQ code to work properly on architectures without NO_IRQ

[Grant Likely]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: glikely at secretlab.ca [mailto:glikely at secretlab.ca] On Behalf Of Grant Likely
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 10:55 AM
>> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
>> Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] drivers/of: Allow IRQ code to work properly on architectures without
>> NO_IRQ
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
>> <stephen.neuendorffer at xilinx.com> wrote:
>> > Sane architectures don't rely on NO_IRQ.  The device tree code shouldn't
>> > require it either.
>>
>> I'm going to sit and think on this for a bit.  I've got the same
>> problem in MIPS, and I want to use the same solution in both cases.
>
> Agreed... I want to reiterate that the bulk of these changes are trying to make the problems
> concrete: I love the fact that the patches are getting smaller as the problems get fixed in a
> general way.

:-)

My favorite patches are the ones that just go away.

g.