[microblaze-uclinux] Re: [RFC PATCH 05/12] of: add common header for flattened device tree representation
Michal Simek
monstr at monstr.eu
Thu Oct 8 01:07:39 EST 2009
Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu> wrote:
>>
>> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Grant,
>>>
>>> Just first obvious thing:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:30:59 -0600 Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h
>>>> index 64e8b3a..5f461f0 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/prom.h
>>>> @@ -17,20 +17,10 @@
>>>> #ifndef _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PROM_H
>>>> #define _ASM_MICROBLAZE_PROM_H
>>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>>> -
>>>> -/* Definitions used by the flattened device tree */
>>>> -#define OF_DT_HEADER 0xd00dfeed /* marker */
>>> This is used in arch/microblaze/kernel/head.S, but you move its
>>> definition inside "#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__" below. You should probably
>>> replace the include of asm/prom.h in arch/microblaze/kernel/head.S with
>>> linux/of_fdt.h (assuming that the comment in there is correct).
>> yes, Stephen is right here. I created one patch (in attachment) which fixed it. I tested your
>> patches on Microblaze (noMMU and MMU) and I have no problem with compilation and simple boot-up
>> works for both versions too.
>>
>> With that my patch: Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu>
>
> Thanks. I'll merge your change with my patch so that bisect isn't broken.
if is possible to do it, please do it.
Thanks,
Michal
>
> g.
>
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list