esdhc binding compatiable

[Kim Phillips]

On Mon, 4 May 2009 16:11:10 -0500
Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:

> I'm inclined to leave the prefix off, though, if the block is truly
> shared (naming and version numbering intact) across Freescale.

agreed.

> > this would be the base compatible.  In addition to that we've  
> > discussed having a fsl,pq-eshdc-vX.Y compat to match the IP version in  
> > the specific SoC.
> 
> I think we should only have the versioned compatible (with significant
> older but compatible versions listed additionally).  Otherwise it's

I'd say 'all' instead of 'significant', because one never knows what
the driver might think significant as it gets developed further down
the road.

> not obvious that "fsl,esdhc" is really "fsl,esdhc-v1.0".

minor nit:  I'd remove the "-v" to make it "fsl,esdhc1.0".  It's really
no loss of clarity, and it saves space.

Kim