[PATCH] libfdt: Use libfdt shared library for testcases

[Josh Boyer]

On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:41:02AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> Link the testcases against the libfdt.so that is built and use
>> it for the testsuite verification.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>Not applied.  Something is wrong here, not quite sure what.
>
>First, after I apply this patch, when I do:
>
>    $ make clean
>    $ make check
>
>I get this:
>
>     DEP flattree.c
>     DEP dtc.c
>     DEP data.c
>     DEP checks.c
>    CHK version_gen.h
>    UPD version_gen.h
>     CC tests/get_mem_rsv.o
>    cc: -lfdt: linker input file unused because linking not done
>     CC libfdt/fdt.o
>     CC libfdt/fdt_ro.o
>     CC libfdt/fdt_wip.o
>     CC libfdt/fdt_sw.o
>     CC libfdt/fdt_rw.o
>     CC libfdt/fdt_strerror.o
>     LD libfdt/libfdt.so
>    /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfdt
>    collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>    make: *** [libfdt/libfdt.so] Error 1

Argh.  Yeah, that's annoying.  I hate makefile dependency crap.

>Doing just:
>
>    $ make
>    $ make check
>
>seems to clear it up and it finishes building.
>So that is promising.

Sort of :)

>However, the "make check" yields funny results:
>
>    $ make check
>
>    ********** TEST SUMMARY
>    *     Total testcases:1197
>    *                PASS:88
>    *                FAIL:0
>    *   Bad configuration:0
>    * Strange test result:1109
>    **********
>
>Not sure there at all..

Was that the first version of 'make clean; make check', or
the second version of 'make; make check'?

I ran the tests with 'make; make check' and they all passed
so I'll assume the first.  I think you get odd results
because the testcases aren't actually runnable.  The
cases where it passes are probably expecting error and/or
don't use libfdt (there are a few like that).

Anyway, I have a few things I need to do today and this
weekend so I'll try to fix up this patch as soon as I can.

josh