[PATCH] Fix libraries (static and dynamic) installation
Jon Loeliger
jdl at jdl.com
Wed Feb 18 03:14:38 EST 2009
> Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve at Freescale.com>
> ---
>
> The static library was not installed at all and the dynamic library was
> installed without execute permission
Emil,
I rearranged that log to put your description in it.
But the real problem is that applying it is a no-op.
I think your patch is mal-formed. Specifically, it
looks like the line counts:
@@ -142,2 +142,2 @@ endif
are bogus. Only 2 lines?
Cleverly, Git applys the patch and yields a commit
with no changes. (Identical tree before and after.)
Clearly wrong.
Can you send me a better patch?
Thanks,
jdl
> Makefile | 7 +++----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 1cfa28a..be0fc8b 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -142,2 +142,2 @@ endif
> # intermediate target and building them again "for real"
> .SECONDARY: $(DTC_GEN_SRCS) $(CONVERT_GEN_SRCS)
>
> -
> -
> install: all
> @$(VECHO) INSTALL
> $(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)
> - $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(BIN) $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)
> + $(INSTALL) $(BIN) $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)
> $(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(LIBDIR)
> - $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(LIBFDT_lib) $(DESTDIR)$(LIBDIR)
> + $(INSTALL) $(LIBFDT_lib) $(DESTDIR)$(LIBDIR)
> + $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(LIBFDT_archive) $(DESTDIR)$(LIBDIR)
> $(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(INCLUDEDIR)
> $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(LIBFDT_include) $(DESTDIR)$(INCLUDEDIR)
>
> --
> 1.6.1.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list