Device tree binding documentation

[Nate Case]

On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:39 -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
> I guess we would need to decide how those documents are published
> without using proprietary software, then, and easily committed to
> another git repository (or the same one just in a published form).
> I don't suppose office xml is a good choice? It should be flexible
> enough and similar enough that sections and layout do not change a
> great deal, and git can easily produce diffs?

I would suggest using DocBook if publishing PDFs is a goal.  It would
also let you output text and HTML as an added bonus.

-- 
Nate Case <ncase at xes-inc.com>