[PATCH] ndfc driver

[Sean MacLennan]

On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:57:12 -1000
"Mitch Bradley" <wmb at firmworks.com> wrote:

> One address/size cell isn't enough for the next generation of NAND
> FLASH chips.
> 

I am no dts expert, but I thought I could put:

	nand {
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <1>;

in my dts and you could put:

	nand {
		#address-cells = <2>;
		#size-cells = <2>;

and, assuming we specified the reg entry right, everything would just
work. Is that assumption wrong?

And if the assumption is true, should I make a note in the doc that you
can make the address and size bigger?

Cheers,
   Sean