[ccan] CCAN status update

冯侦探 fengzt at dsp.ac.cn
Fri Mar 21 20:30:37 EST 2008


Luis Araujo 写道:
> Adam Kennedy wrote:
>> This somewhat depends on what exactly we're talking about as the 
>> "repository".
>>
>> I am mostly referring to a version control repo that will hold the 
>> website content, the indexer and mirroring and etc code, and so on.
>
> Something like PAUSE?
>>
>> The master CCAN repository should be a simple FTP-mirrorable 
>> directory structure containing the release tarballs, with a database 
>> of some sort to hold all the metadata and master indexes.
> Yes, using FTP would be simple and nice, we could even probably use 
> wget for fetching these tarballs too?
>
> Also, what do you mean by database? , postgre, mysql stuff? , if it is 
> so, I think that might be too bloated.
>
>>>  
>>>> Where each individual author, or collection of authors, choose to 
>>>> store
>>>> their modules should not need to be important.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> It's a good point, but I'd like to do this without dropping back to 
>>> svn on the main server.
>> As I understand decentralized version control (bzr, mercurial, etc) 
>> there's no way I can commit to the project?
>>
>> I have to send every single change to you by email as a patch file?
>>
>> So lets assume we hit the first scaling threshold of 100 modules and 
>> 20-50 developers, exactly how many patch files is that one central 
>> person going to need to manage a day?
>>
>> Or am I seeing this wrong?
>>
> I would favor using SVN , or if we would like something new and 
> radical, probably Git?, this is about the CCAN project repo right? :-)
>
> Though, as I follow the conversation, I can't see clearly the purpose 
> of these repositories , you mean, a repository for the CCAN project, a 
> repository for the CCAN packages modules , or anything else?
>
As this point. I am also a little confused.
I prefer SVN simply because our project is running under it. Err, 
actually, I am not farmilar with other version control tools' feature.
Further more, I think version control tools are just tools. Is it 
necessary need somebody to run the test and review the modules and 
he/she is responsible for the repository?
It maybe a liitle complex , however may safe to some extend :-)


> Regards,
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccan mailing list
> ccan at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/ccan
>


-- 

Best Wishes~
=================================

Zhentan Feng
Email:fengzt at dsp.ac.cn
Tel: +86 10 6256 5615 ext.403
Mobile:13810462675

DSP and Network Research Center
Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beisihuan West Road 21, Beijing 100080, China

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fengzt.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 156 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/ccan/attachments/20080321/c6734fb5/attachment.vcf>


More information about the ccan mailing list