[Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] spufs: fix invalid scheduling of forgotten contexts

Jeremy Kerr jk at ozlabs.org
Thu Feb 28 10:51:26 EST 2008


At present, we have a situation where a context with no owner is
re-scheduled by spu_forget:

	Thread 1: reading regs file	Thread 2: context owner

					spu_forget()
						- ctx->owner = NULL
						- set SPU_SCHED_WAS_ACTIVE

	spu_acquire_saved()
	- context is in saved state

	spu_release_saved()
	- SPU_SCHED_WAS_ACTIVE is set,
	  so spu_activate() the context,
	  which now has no owner

In spu_forget(), we shouldn't be requesting a re-schedule by setting
SPU_SCHED_WAS_ACTIVE. This change removes the set_bit in spu_forget(),
so that spu_release_saved() doesn't reinsert this destroyed context on
to the run queue.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk at ozlabs.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c
index 133995e..cf6c2c8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c
@@ -109,13 +109,12 @@ void spu_forget(struct spu_context *ctx)
 
 	/*
 	 * This is basically an open-coded spu_acquire_saved, except that
-	 * we don't acquire the state mutex interruptible.
+	 * we don't acquire the state mutex interruptible, and we don't
+	 * want this context to be rescheduled on release.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->state_mutex);
-	if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_SAVED) {
-		set_bit(SPU_SCHED_WAS_ACTIVE, &ctx->sched_flags);
+	if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_SAVED)
 		spu_deactivate(ctx);
-	}
 
 	mm = ctx->owner;
 	ctx->owner = NULL;



More information about the cbe-oss-dev mailing list