[Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] [POWERPC] spufs: fix order of sputrace thread IDs
Jeremy Kerr
jk at ozlabs.org
Mon Feb 25 15:02:22 EST 2008
Currently, we get the following output from sputrace:
[5.097935954] 1606: spufs_ps_nopfn__enter (thread = 1605, spu = -1)
[5.097958164] 1606: spufs_ps_nopfn__insert (thread = 1605, spu = 15)
[5.097973529] 1607: spufs_ps_nopfn__enter (thread = 1605, spu = -1)
[5.097989174] 1607: spufs_ps_nopfn__insert (thread = 1605, spu = 14)
Which leads me to believe that 160[67] is the current thread ID, and
1605 is the context backing the psmap.
However, the 'current' and 'owner' tids are reversed - the 'current'
tid is on the right. This change puts the current thread ID in the
left-hand column instead.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk at ozlabs.org>
---
Christoph - is this the correct ordering?
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c
index 01974f7..c9f0bec 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sputrace.c
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ static int sputrace_sprint(char *tbuf, int n)
"[%lu.%09lu] %d: %s (thread = %d, spu = %d)\n",
(unsigned long) tv.tv_sec,
(unsigned long) tv.tv_nsec,
- t->owner_tid,
- t->name,
t->curr_tid,
+ t->name,
+ t->owner_tid,
t->number);
}
More information about the cbe-oss-dev
mailing list