[Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 08/21] spusched: fix cpu/node binding
Jeremy Kerr
jk at ozlabs.org
Fri Jun 29 10:57:56 EST 2007
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Add a cpus_allowed allowed filed to struct spu_context so that we always
use the cpu mask of the owning thread instead of the one happening to
call into the scheduler. Also use this information in
grab_runnable_context to avoid spurious wakeups.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk at ozlabs.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c
index c778d91..6ff2a75 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/context.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct spu_context *alloc_spu_context(struct spu_gang *gang)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->rq);
if (gang)
spu_gang_add_ctx(gang, ctx);
-
+ ctx->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
spu_set_timeslice(ctx);
goto out;
out_free:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
index 3707c7f..6927262 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
@@ -112,6 +112,16 @@ void __spu_update_sched_info(struct spu_context *ctx)
else
ctx->prio = current->static_prio;
ctx->policy = current->policy;
+
+ /*
+ * A lot of places that don't hold active_mutex poke into
+ * cpus_allowed, including grab_runnable_context which
+ * already holds the runq_lock. So abuse runq_lock
+ * to protect this field aswell.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
+ ctx->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
+ spin_unlock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
}
void spu_update_sched_info(struct spu_context *ctx)
@@ -123,16 +133,27 @@ void spu_update_sched_info(struct spu_context *ctx)
mutex_unlock(&spu_prio->active_mutex[node]);
}
-static inline int node_allowed(int node)
+static int __node_allowed(struct spu_context *ctx, int node)
{
- cpumask_t mask;
+ if (nr_cpus_node(node)) {
+ cpumask_t mask = node_to_cpumask(node);
- if (!nr_cpus_node(node))
- return 0;
- mask = node_to_cpumask(node);
- if (!cpus_intersects(mask, current->cpus_allowed))
- return 0;
- return 1;
+ if (cpus_intersects(mask, ctx->cpus_allowed))
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int node_allowed(struct spu_context *ctx, int node)
+{
+ int rval;
+
+ spin_lock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
+ rval = __node_allowed(ctx, node);
+ spin_unlock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
+
+ return rval;
}
/**
@@ -289,7 +310,7 @@ static struct spu *spu_get_idle(struct spu_context *ctx)
for (n = 0; n < MAX_NUMNODES; n++, node++) {
node = (node < MAX_NUMNODES) ? node : 0;
- if (!node_allowed(node))
+ if (!node_allowed(ctx, node))
continue;
spu = spu_alloc_node(node);
if (spu)
@@ -321,7 +342,7 @@ static struct spu *find_victim(struct spu_context *ctx)
node = cpu_to_node(raw_smp_processor_id());
for (n = 0; n < MAX_NUMNODES; n++, node++) {
node = (node < MAX_NUMNODES) ? node : 0;
- if (!node_allowed(node))
+ if (!node_allowed(ctx, node))
continue;
mutex_lock(&spu_prio->active_mutex[node]);
@@ -416,23 +437,28 @@ int spu_activate(struct spu_context *ctx, unsigned long flags)
* Remove the highest priority context on the runqueue and return it
* to the caller. Returns %NULL if no runnable context was found.
*/
-static struct spu_context *grab_runnable_context(int prio)
+static struct spu_context *grab_runnable_context(int prio, int node)
{
- struct spu_context *ctx = NULL;
+ struct spu_context *ctx;
int best;
spin_lock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
best = sched_find_first_bit(spu_prio->bitmap);
- if (best < prio) {
+ while (best < prio) {
struct list_head *rq = &spu_prio->runq[best];
- BUG_ON(list_empty(rq));
-
- ctx = list_entry(rq->next, struct spu_context, rq);
- __spu_del_from_rq(ctx);
+ list_for_each_entry(ctx, rq, rq) {
+ /* XXX(hch): check for affinity here aswell */
+ if (__node_allowed(ctx, node)) {
+ __spu_del_from_rq(ctx);
+ goto found;
+ }
+ }
+ best++;
}
+ ctx = NULL;
+ found:
spin_unlock(&spu_prio->runq_lock);
-
return ctx;
}
@@ -442,7 +468,7 @@ static int __spu_deactivate(struct spu_context *ctx, int force, int max_prio)
struct spu_context *new = NULL;
if (spu) {
- new = grab_runnable_context(max_prio);
+ new = grab_runnable_context(max_prio, spu->node);
if (new || force) {
spu_remove_from_active_list(spu);
spu_unbind_context(spu, ctx);
@@ -496,9 +522,11 @@ static void spusched_tick(struct spu_context *ctx)
* tick and try again.
*/
if (mutex_trylock(&ctx->state_mutex)) {
- struct spu_context *new = grab_runnable_context(ctx->prio + 1);
+ struct spu *spu = ctx->spu;
+ struct spu_context *new;
+
+ new = grab_runnable_context(ctx->prio + 1, spu->node);
if (new) {
- struct spu *spu = ctx->spu;
__spu_remove_from_active_list(spu);
spu_unbind_context(spu, ctx);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h
index ff77f90..98d3c18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/spufs.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <asm/spu.h>
#include <asm/spu_csa.h>
@@ -80,6 +81,7 @@ struct spu_context {
struct list_head rq;
unsigned int time_slice;
unsigned long sched_flags;
+ cpumask_t cpus_allowed;
int policy;
int prio;
};
--
1.5.0.rc4.g85b1
More information about the cbe-oss-dev
mailing list