[Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
Maynard Johnson
maynardj at us.ibm.com
Mon Feb 19 10:18:56 EST 2007
Maynard Johnson wrote:
>Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Friday 16 February 2007 01:32, Maynard Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>config OPROFILE_CELL
>>> bool "OProfile for Cell Broadband Engine"
>>> depends on OPROFILE && SPU_FS
>>> default y if ((SPU_FS = y && OPROFILE = y) || (SPU_FS = m &&
>>>OPROFILE = m))
>>> help
>>> Profiling of Cell BE SPUs requires special support enabled
>>> by this option. Both SPU_FS and OPROFILE options must be
>>> set 'y' or both be set 'm'.
>>>=============
>>>
>>>Can anyone see a problem with any of this . . . or perhaps a suggestion
>>>of a better way?
>>>
>>>
>>The text suggests it doesn't allow SPU_FS=y with OPROFILE=m, which I think
>>should be allowed.
>>
>>
>Right, good catch. I'll add another OR to the 'default y' and correct
>the text.
>
>
Actually, it makes more sense to do the following:
config OPROFILE_CELL
bool "OProfile for Cell Broadband Engine"
depends on (SPU_FS = y && OPROFILE = m) || (SPU_FS = y &&
OPROFILE = y) || (SPU_FS = m && OPROFILE = m)
default y
help
Profiling of Cell BE SPUs requires special support enabled by
this option.
> > I also don't see any place in the code where you actually
>
>
>>use CONFIG_OPROFILE_CELL.
>>
>>
>As I mentioned, I will use CONFIG_OPROFILE_CELL in the
>arch/powerpc/oprofile/Makefile as follows:
> oprofile-$(CONFIG_OPROFILE_CELL) += op_model_cell.o \
> cell/spu_profiler.o cell/vma_map.o cell/spu_task_sync.o
>
>
>
>
[snip]
>> Arnd <><
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
>https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
More information about the cbe-oss-dev
mailing list