[Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] spidernet: fix interrupt reason recognition

[Ishizaki Kou]

Linas-san,

Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:13:27PM +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > > Please apply this to 2.6.23.
> > 
> > I'll review and forward shortly.  Kick me if you don't see a formal
> > reply in a few days.
> > 
> > > And also, please apply the following Arnd-san's patch to fix a problem
> > > that spidernet driver sometimes causes a BUG_ON at open.
> > > 
> > >  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cbe-oss-dev/patch?id=12211
> > 
> > Are you sure? This patch no longer applies cleanly, in part because
> 
> I see. I'll send another applicable patch.
> 
> > your patch "[PATCH] spidernet: improve interrupt handling" 
> > from Mon, 09 Jul 2007 added a spider_net_enable_interrupts(card); 
> > at the end of spider_net_open().  Because of this, it seems like 
> > Arnd's patch is no longer needed, right?
> 
> As you pointed out, we intended that "[PATCH] spidernet: improve
> interrupt handling" solves the same problem which Arnd's patch solves.
> 
> When spider_net_open() is called, interrupt reasons sometimes remain
> on interrupt status register, even though they are masked by mask
> register.  With this patch, spider_net_interrupt() compares the value
> of interrupt status register with SPIDER_NET_INTX_MASK_VALUE, not with
> interrupt mask register value.  As a result, spider_net_interrupt()
> (which is called from request_irq() in spider_net_open()) starts
> polling and causes BUG_ON().
> 
> So, netif_poll_enable() must be called before request_irq() is
> called. This is the reason that we also need Arnd's patch.


How about following two patches that I posted last week:

 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cbe-oss-dev/patch?id=12997
 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cbe-oss-dev/patch?id=13049

Best regards,
Kou Ishizaki