<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Andrew,<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/31/24 20:37, Andrew Jeffery wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:fcdb4d899effa877e1acc0576194425484d5208a.camel@codeconstruct.com.au"><span
style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
+
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
This whitespace change seems unnecessary.</pre>
</blockquote>
Fixed the whitespace in version 2.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:fcdb4d899effa877e1acc0576194425484d5208a.camel@codeconstruct.com.au">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Note that none of these maxim-specific properties are documented in the
upstream bindings. You will need to get that addressed either before or
in the same series as this DTS patch when you send it upstream.
Can you please fix up the whitespace and re-send this to the OpenBMC
list, with the appropriate subject prefix, and _without_ including the
upstream maintainers and lists (but still including Joel and myself)?
Please reach out if there's anything that needs clarification before
you do so.
Andrew
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>Got it. Thank you for the review.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Ninad Palsule<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>