<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type><!-- flashmail style begin -->
<STYLE type=text/css>
body {border-width:0;margin:0}
img {border:0;margin:0;padding:0}
</STYLE>
<BASE target=_blank><!-- flashmail style end -->
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 11.00.10570.1001"></HEAD>
<BODY
style="BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; FONT-FAMILY: arial; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; COLOR: #000000; MARGIN: 12px; LINE-HEIGHT: 1.5; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px"
marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">
<DIV>You use both fixed sensor and dynamic sensors?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; COLOR: #c0c0c0"
align=left>2021-01-15
<HR id=SignNameHR
style="BORDER-TOP: #c0c0c0 1px solid; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; WIDTH: 122px; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px"
align=left>
<SPAN id=_FlashSignName>chunhui.jia</SPAN> </DIV>
<HR
style="BORDER-TOP: #c0c0c0 1px solid; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px">
<BLOCKQUOTE id=ntes-flashmail-quote
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px">
<DIV><STRONG>发件人：</STRONG>Lei Yu <yulei.sh@bytedance.com></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>发送时间：</STRONG>2021-01-15 10:23</DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>主题：</STRONG>Re: Intel-ipmi-oem repo</DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>收件人：</STRONG>"Vernon
Mauery"<vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>抄送：</STRONG>"Willy Tu"<wltu@google.com>,"OpenBMC
Maillist"<openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,"chunhui.jia"<chunhui.jia@linux.intel.com>,"Ed
Tanous"<edtanous@google.com>,"Brad
Bishop"<bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com>,"apparao.puli"<apparao.puli@linux.intel.com>,"Vijay
Khemka"<vijaykhemka@fb.com></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:23 AM Vernon Mauery </DIV>
<DIV><vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com> wrote: </DIV>
<DIV>> I would say that if IBM is the only company using the sensor </DIV>
<DIV>> implementation that is currently in ipmid, it would be best to move it </DIV>
<DIV>> to the IBM OEM layer. But it is difficult in a project this size who is </DIV>
<DIV>> using what. So leaving it in ipmid for now is fine. </DIV>
<DIV>> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This is not the case. Bytedance uses ipmid with fixed yaml as well. </DIV>
<DIV>In our case, we have all the sensors on DBus created by </DIV>
<DIV>entity-manager/dbus-sensors, and only part of them are necessary for </DIV>
<DIV>ipmi. </DIV>
<DIV>So we specifically define the necessary sensors (and </DIV>
<DIV>inventory-sensors) in yaml and use the current ipmid to implement </DIV>
<DIV>them. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>AFAIK Yadro and Ampere uses ipmid with fixed yaml too. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>-- </DIV>
<DIV>BRs, </DIV>
<DIV>Lei YU </DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>