<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hello William,</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12">https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12</a></p>
This issue got reported on openbmc master which is needed for
OpenBMC 2.8 release. The VLAN creation is failing via IPMI and the
trace indicates the failure to delete the non static address. <br>
This had worked on the earlier 2.7 community release. I have not
followed much the changes on the phosphor-networkd front.<br>
Since you had helped rewrite the transport handler. Can you help
comment on the issue?<br>
<br>
Copying Johnathan, do you run into this on your platforms?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Tom<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05-06-2020 15:53, Prashanth Katti1
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:OFF1020D53.5F22D36A-ON0025857E.00374E05-6525857E.00391C68@notes.na.collabserv.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Hi All,</span><br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">We tested
Firmware version : 2.8.0-rc1-0-g35a774200 on Witherspoon, and
found following issues.</span><br>
<br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">DHCP
- </span><a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/issues/127"
moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/issues/127</span></a><br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">LDAP
- </span><a
href="https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2020-May/021702.html"
moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2020-May/021702.html</span></a><br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">VLAN via REST
- </span><a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3668"
moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3668</span></a><br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">VLAN via IPMI
- </span><a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12"
moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12</span></a><br>
<br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Rest of the
functionalities looks good and are stable in our testing.</span><br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Hope this
input helps.</span><br>
<br>
<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Prashanth
Katti</span><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
</span><span style="
font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">krtaylor <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com"><kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com></a></span><br>
<span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
</span><span style="
font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">OpenBMC Maillist <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org"><openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org></a></span><br>
<span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
</span><span style="
font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">03-06-2020 00:46</span><br>
<span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
</span><span style="
font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">[EXTERNAL] Re: OpenBMC 2.8
Release</span><br>
<span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Sent
by: </span><span style="
font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"openbmc" <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:openbmc-bounces+gkeishin=in.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org"><openbmc-bounces+gkeishin=in.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org></a></span><br>
<hr noshade="noshade"><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">On 5/4/20 1:29 AM, Deepak
Kodihalli wrote:<br>
> On 04/05/20 10:43 am, Andrew Jeffery wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, at 02:30, Gunnar Mills wrote:<br>
>>> On 4/29/2020 10:48 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote:<br>
>>>> just add it directly here:<br>
>>>> </span></tt><a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Current-Release-Content"
moz-do-not-send="true"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Current-Release-Content</span></tt></a><tt><span
style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
>>> Added:<br>
>>> * Yocto refresh to "Dunfell" version 3.1<br>
>>> * Redfish support for: full certificate
management, complete LDAP<br>
>>> management, full sensor support, event service
schema, task schema<br>
>>> * Move to Redfish Specification 1.9.0<br>
>>> * Redfish support for 2019.4 Schemas<br>
>>> * GUI enhancements: LDAP, certificate
management<br>
<br>
We are targeting this Friday, June 5th for release 2.8. I'm
not seeing <br>
much (or any) discussion on testing. If you have tested the
release tag <br>
please post the results for your platform. Any blockers?<br>
<br>
</span></tt><a
href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/releases"
moz-do-not-send="true"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/releases</span></tt></a><tt><span
style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
<br>
Also, please review and add content to the release notes here:<br>
<br>
</span></tt><a
href="https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/docs/+/32440"
moz-do-not-send="true"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/docs/+/32440</span></tt></a><tt><span
style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
<br>
Thanks everyone!<br>
<br>
Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)<br>
<br>
>>><br>
>>> And removed "`Redfish configuration backup and
restore function`".<br>
>>> James, Jason are you okay with the Redfish list
above? Should we add<br>
>>> something about Storage & Drives? Anything
else?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Should we add something about the Kernel? "Move
to 5.4"?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Anything for PLDM / MCTP? For the 2.7 release it
says "Partial PLDM<br>
>>> Support" and "Partial MCTP Support".<br>
>><br>
>> Certainly MCTP support is still "Partial". Slowly
progressing with <br>
>> help from<br>
>> Intel.<br>
> <br>
> Same goes for PLDM. There's definitely more PLDM specs
and commands <br>
> implemented in libpldm since the 2.7 release though.<br>
> <br>
>> Andrew<br>
>><br>
> <br>
<br>
</span></tt><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>