<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body>
    Tom,<br>
    <br>
    I have not seen any defects concerning VLAN..... yet.<br>
    Testing this on my own system for the NCSI channel (e.g. lan id 1)
    our BMC behaves in the same way as reported in issue 12.<br>
    I haven't tested/used VLAN in ages, and never on OBMC, so I can't
    say if this is a regression.<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/12/20 8:11 AM, TOM JOSEPH wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:5b3a91d9-531d-974a-fc39-489983dc22c4@linux.vnet.ibm.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <p>Hello William,</p>
      <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
          href="https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12"
          moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12</a></p>
      This issue got reported on openbmc master which is needed for
      OpenBMC 2.8 release. The VLAN creation is failing via IPMI and the
      trace indicates the failure to delete the non static address. <br>
      This had worked on the earlier 2.7 community release. I have not
      followed much the changes on the phosphor-networkd front.<br>
      Since you had helped rewrite the transport handler. Can you help
      comment on the issue?<br>
      <br>
      Copying Johnathan, do you run into this on your platforms?<br>
      <br>
      Regards,<br>
      Tom<br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05-06-2020 15:53, Prashanth Katti1
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:OFF1020D53.5F22D36A-ON0025857E.00374E05-6525857E.00391C68@notes.na.collabserv.com">
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Hi All,</span><br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">We tested
          Firmware version : 2.8.0-rc1-0-g35a774200 on Witherspoon, and
          found following issues.</span><br>
        <br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">DHCP      
                       - </span><a
          href="https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/issues/127"
          moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
            font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/issues/127</span></a><br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">LDAP      
                        - </span><a
          href="https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2020-May/021702.html"
          moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
            font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2020-May/021702.html</span></a><br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">VLAN via
          REST - </span><a
          href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3668"
          moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
            font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/issues/3668</span></a><br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">VLAN via
          IPMI     - </span><a
          href="https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12"
          moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="
            font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-net-ipmid/issues/12</span></a><br>
        <br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Rest of the
          functionalities looks good and are stable in our testing.</span><br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Hope this
          input helps.</span><br>
        <br>
        <span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Prashanth
          Katti</span><br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <span style="
          font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:    
             </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">krtaylor
          <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
            href="mailto:kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true"><kurt.r.taylor@gmail.com></a></span><br>
        <span style="
          font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:      
           </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">OpenBMC
          Maillist <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
            href="mailto:openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org"
            moz-do-not-send="true"><openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org></a></span><br>
        <span style="
          font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:    
             </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">03-06-2020
          00:46</span><br>
        <span style="
          font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:  
               </span><span style="
          font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">[EXTERNAL] Re: OpenBMC
          2.8 Release</span><br>
        <span style="
          font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Sent by:  
               </span><span style="
          font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"openbmc" <a
            class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
            href="mailto:openbmc-bounces+gkeishin=in.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org"
            moz-do-not-send="true"><openbmc-bounces+gkeishin=in.ibm.com@lists.ozlabs.org></a></span><br>
        <hr noshade="noshade"><br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">On 5/4/20 1:29 AM, Deepak
            Kodihalli wrote:<br>
            > On 04/05/20 10:43 am, Andrew Jeffery wrote:<br>
            >><br>
            >><br>
            >> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, at 02:30, Gunnar Mills wrote:<br>
            >>> On 4/29/2020 10:48 AM, Kurt Taylor wrote:<br>
            >>>> just add it directly here:<br>
            >>>> </span></tt><a
          href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Current-Release-Content"
          moz-do-not-send="true"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/wiki/Current-Release-Content</span></tt></a><tt><span
            style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
            >>> Added:<br>
            >>>   * Yocto refresh to "Dunfell" version 3.1<br>
            >>>   * Redfish support for: full certificate
            management, complete LDAP<br>
            >>> management, full sensor support, event service
            schema, task schema<br>
            >>>   * Move to Redfish Specification 1.9.0<br>
            >>>   * Redfish support for 2019.4 Schemas<br>
            >>>   * GUI enhancements: LDAP, certificate
            management<br>
            <br>
            We are targeting this Friday, June 5th for release 2.8. I'm
            not seeing <br>
            much (or any) discussion on testing. If you have tested the
            release tag <br>
            please post the results for your platform. Any blockers?<br>
            <br>
          </span></tt><a
          href="https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/releases"
          moz-do-not-send="true"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/releases</span></tt></a><tt><span
            style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
            <br>
            Also, please review and add content to the release notes
            here:<br>
            <br>
          </span></tt><a
          href="https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/docs/+/32440"
          moz-do-not-send="true"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/docs/+/32440</span></tt></a><tt><span
            style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
            <br>
            Thanks everyone!<br>
            <br>
            Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)<br>
            <br>
            >>><br>
            >>> And removed "`Redfish configuration backup and
            restore function`".<br>
            >>> James, Jason are you okay with the Redfish list
            above? Should we add<br>
            >>> something about Storage & Drives? Anything
            else?<br>
            >>><br>
            >>> Should we add something about the Kernel? "Move
            to 5.4"?<br>
            >>><br>
            >>> Anything for PLDM / MCTP? For the 2.7 release
            it says "Partial PLDM<br>
            >>> Support" and "Partial MCTP Support".<br>
            >><br>
            >> Certainly MCTP support is still "Partial". Slowly
            progressing with <br>
            >> help from<br>
            >> Intel.<br>
            > <br>
            > Same goes for PLDM. There's definitely more PLDM specs
            and commands <br>
            > implemented in libpldm since the 2.7 release though.<br>
            > <br>
            >> Andrew<br>
            >><br>
            > <br>
            <br>
          </span></tt><br>
        <br>
        <br>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <title></title>
      <font color="#1F497D"><font face="Century Gothic">Johnathan Mantey<br>
          <small>Senior Software Engineer</small><br>
          <big><font color="#555555"><small><b>azad te</b><b>chnology
                  partners</b></small><br>
              <small><font color="#1F497D"><small>Contributing to
                    Technology Innovation since 1992</small></font><small><br>
                  <font color="#1F497D">Phone: (503) 712-6764<br>
                    Email: <a href="mailto:johnathanx.mantey@intel.com">johnathanx.mantey@intel.com</a></font></small><br>
                <br>
              </small></font></big></font></font> </div>
  </body>
</html>