<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:53 PM Brad Bishop <<a href="mailto:bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com">bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 06:16:20PM +0000, Vijay Khemka wrote:<br>
> Team,<br>
> Intel-ipmi-oem should be broken and 2 parts, genric and oem specific. I see several functionality in this repo like sensors and storage commands are generic enough to be used by other platform who is using entity manager. So I feel that we should have these functionalities to be moved to a separate common repo which can be used by everyone and this repo can only contain Intel OEM specific IPMI command support.<br>
> <br>
> My 2 cents 😊<br>
<br>
In general I support the goal here.<br>
<br>
More repos, sure. Let me know what you want them called, who the<br>
maintainers of each should be, and confirm that they can be licensed<br>
as Apache-2.0.<br>
<br>
Sorry Vijay - I'm going to hijack your thread. This is something<br>
I've been thinking about lately and your note put it at a tipping<br>
point for me.<br>
<br>
We have evolved into a bit of a wild-west culture as far as putting code<br>
(repos) up in the openbmc namespace. There are simply no rules at all.<br>
Anyone can simply ask Brad for a repo and it gets created, no questions<br>
asked, no accountability.<br>
<br>
So I guess a quick poll - does anyone find this concerning (or not)?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm holding the hypothesis that things expand for a bit, and then fall back onto themselves. -- which maybe isn't the best approach. I could be wrong, it could be the universe expanding and accelerating, which has the unfortunate consequence of moving galaxies further apart -- code less compatible or allowing more duplication.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
fwiw, I think I'm ok with this model at this point in the project,<br>
assuming that the rules (or lack thereof) apply to everyone equally.<br>
<br>
thx - brad<br>
</blockquote></div></div>